Peace
of the Religions at the Temple Mount
An indispensable condition for
a sustainable peace in the Middle East:
An
update, 2007 [Gottfried Hutter – www.temple-project.de,
gottfried.hutter@gmx.de]
Since I have started to send out
this proposal its perspective has shifted somewhat. Its foreground now is
constituted by a practical proposition to the leaders of the three Abrahamic faiths, namely to set up an inter-religious court or an inter-religious
mediation-facility – to deal with the
much dreaded question:
Who
is the rightful owner of “Haram Ash-Sharif”, the
“Temple Mount”?
Usually
this question is taboo. Ventilating the subject makes emotions run high –
revealing that this place has a fundamental impact on the entire Middle East
conflict.
The belief of secular forces that tensions can be reduced by simply
disregarding the significance of the Temple Mount for religious Jews is in fact
no help but an obstacle to solving the conflict because the importance of this
place for the Jews cannot be eliminated by any such scheme – and no less its
importance for the Muslims. Also to say “there never was a Temple at that site”
will not solve the conflict. The discrepancy between the claims of Muslims and
Jews will continue to be a perpetual cause of flare-ups in tensions as it has
been – from the bloody disturbances of the year 1929 down to the recent
protests about repair work on the access ramp at the Western Wall. Whatever peace
may be reached politically between Israelis and Palestinians, this place will
remain a source of ever renewed antagonism as long as its legal ownership and
its proper use are not clarified to everyone’s satisfaction.
The only way to attain sustainable peace therefore is to resolve the
dispute by determining the rightful ownership and use of that piece of land.
Only an inter-religious legal procedure involving all three Abrahamic
faiths will be able to accomplish that. – And a vision of a peaceful solution
will be needed beforehand, because without a positive outlook the parties will
refuse to take recourse to this inter-religious court.
Hence my proposal.
It can
serve as a model for the suggested legal proceedings because it favors not one
of the three faiths but all three of them. It provides for a symbolically just
distribution of the space available, appropriate to the essence of the three
religions. There will be no losers. All three parties will emerge victorious.
In
contrast to the approach predominant in the Middle East conflict, the proposal
is not problem-oriented but solution-focused:
Since
the present is characterized by problems, the proposed image of peace needs to
have its roots in the future, in a time when the conflict will be resolved to
everybody’s satisfaction. Thus it can show a common sanctuary of the three Abrahamic faiths involving “Haram
Ash-Sharif”, the “Temple Mount”, and the future
Jewish Temple as one part of it. Not one of the existing structures of “Haram Ash-Sharif” will be touched in the process. Therefore
all parties will emerge as winners.
Without
having to take anything away from anyone, by accepting this proposal the Jews
will gain universal recognition to their right to build a New Temple at the
very spot prescribed by Halacha – not implicating
that they will have to build it. By
fully integrating themselves into the whole of the Abrahamic
community the Muslims will gain universal respect for the spiritual dignity of
Islam. And the Christians too will gain what they hope for: a deeply humane
solution. – For more details please read the articles below.
On the basis of this proposal all parties can dare to send out their
envoys to build one common spiritual/clerical/secular court for an unheard of
task: the seemingly impossible, but in any case finally unavoidable, and this
way even very promising clarification of the rights of ownership and use to
that given piece of land, which is the symbolic spiritual center of the whole
conflict.
Could the positive transforming power of this image not completely
change the political and the religious situation not only of the Middle East but worldwide?
That much for the update, and as information
for the ones new to the proposal some of its history:
As you may notice from the reactions below since 2002, the proposal has
gotten much international attention.
In 2005 German TV aired a 90-minute public discussion about it between
high ranking representatives of the three Abrahamic
faiths. Synchronized in Arabic it also has been broadcasted all over the Middle
East.
In 2006 I presented the proposal to a large Middle East conference in
Amman, WOCMES2. As a result a Palestinian parish priest suggested constructing
a model of the proposed common sanctuary in his village. That in turn motivated
the Technical University in Munich, Germany, to organize a planning competition
for just that purpose.
The articles which follow deal with the question why peace calls for a
common sanctuary of the three Abrahamic faiths, why
at the Temple Mount, and how that can be made possible.
1. Article, “Why
the three Abrahamic religions need a common sanctuary
and why at the Temple Mount”
http://www.tempel-projekt.de/Why%20it%20needs%20a%20common%20sanctuary_%20short%20Article.htm
2. “A Future Image of Peace”, paper presented to the international
Middle East conference in Amman, WOCMES2, hosted by the Royal Jordanian Institute
for Inter-Faith Studies
in June 2006 http://www.tempel-projekt.de/Paper%20for%20wocmes2%20Amman%202006.htm
3. International
reactions: http://www.tempel-projekt.de/Reactions%20to%20the%20project.htm