“Israel” – a Secular State?
The key to peace –
revealed in the name “Israel”?
[13.3.2013]
Today’s
Israel was founded, so the story goes, by a purely secular movement, the
“Zionists”. If that had been true their choice of the name of “Israel” as the
name of their state would have been strange to say the least. If the Zionists were a solely secular
movement, why did they choose “Israel” rather than, say, “Zion” or “Judea” or
“Canaan”?
Could
these Zionists really have been so secular as not to know the narrative
connected with the name “Israel”? Even if that had been the case, wouldn’t they
have looked up the name in the dictionary before deciding on it? It seems more
likely that the Zionists knew perfectly well that “Israel” is by no means a
secular name.
“Israel” is, in fact, the most un-secular name
imaginable, because “Israel” is the name Jacob was given when he returned to
the Promised Land, after decades in exile:
Jacob
had been in exile because he had cheated his brother Esau out of his
birthright. He had embezzled the blessing of his father Isaac, and then fled
the country.
In
order to wield his birthright he had to return to the country of his birth, and
in order to do that he had to face his brother.
Esau
had already heard of his brother’s coming. He had mustered a small army of 400
men to meet him.
Jacob
was scared.
At
first he pieced together a huge herd of the best of his animals and sent it
ahead to offer it as a present to his brother, as his gift of reunion – in
combination with his request for forgiveness.
While still some way off, he sent the remainder of his people
across the river Jabbok to prepare the meeting with
his brother as his messengers of peace.
Jacob
alone remained on the far shore of the river. He spent the night in prayer.
There he encountered an unknown force, fighting with him all night long. This
was no ordinary fight and Jacob’s opponent was no ordinary opponent, it was a
representation of God himself. That much Jacob realized. Before the night was
over his opponent wanted to leave, but Jacob clung to him and would not let him
go – unless, so Jacob requested, he blessed him. At that point the fight grew
so intense that Jacob’s hip was dislocated, and for the rest of his life, Jacob
could walk only with a limp. But in the end Jacob received the requested
blessing and with that blessing he received a new name: henceforth, his name
was to be “Israel”, “the one who fought with God and won”.
Out
of all possible choices the purely lay Zionist movement selected that name,
“Israel”, to be the name of their newly reborn state – clearly referring to the
return of their father Jacob from his exile. Who would they want to make
believe that this had no significance and that their state was purely secular?
Could
Prime Minister Rabin – or any other Israeli politician –have ever believed that
“Israel” could be a solely secular state? And what welcome present did the
Israelis have in store? How did they propose to appease their displaced
Palestinian brothers and sisters in God?
Thus,
the name “Israel” contains the key to modern-day Israel’s quest for peace. It
makes clear that Israelis need first to apologize for intruding into the sacred
space of the Umma
(as Jacob apologized when he returned from his exile); then they need to bring
a generous present to their hosts (instead of disowning them).
To
bring a present was on Theodor Herzl’s mind. He offered cover for the Sultan’s budget.
But the Sultan dismissed his offer. The essential other part was missing, the
apology, the compassion. It seems that Herzl had not fully realized what it
meant for the Islamic Umma
to have a non-Islamic entity intruding.
Both
are needed, the compassionate apology and the generous gift – but after that
the returning Jews will be entitled to refer to the Qur’an’s commandment of
acceptance of all children of Abraham, and then their former hosts will no
longer be entitled to demand any submission (as the Sharia-dhimmi-standard). Then both will
meet eye to eye to negotiate their way of coexistence and cooperation in a
peaceful atmosphere.
Gottfried
Hutter, chairman of “the Temple Project Association”